Advances in automotive crash test dummies based on injury biomechanics

TIAN Tengfei; LIU Zhixin; WANG Lizhen

doi:10.6052/1000-0992-25-033

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Advances in Mechanics > 2026 > Accepted Manuscript

Tian T F, Liu Z X, Wang L Z. Advances in automotive crash test dummies based on injury biomechanics. Advances in Mechanics, in press doi: 10.6052/1000-0992-25-033

Citation:

Tian T F, Liu Z X, Wang L Z. Advances in automotive crash test dummies based on injury biomechanics. Advances in Mechanics, in press doi: 10.6052/1000-0992-25-033

Tian T F, Liu Z X, Wang L Z. Advances in automotive crash test dummies based on injury biomechanics. Advances in Mechanics, in press doi: 10.6052/1000-0992-25-033

Citation:

Tian T F, Liu Z X, Wang L Z. Advances in automotive crash test dummies based on injury biomechanics. Advances in Mechanics, in press doi: 10.6052/1000-0992-25-033

PDF( 15933 KB)

Advances in automotive crash test dummies based on injury biomechanics

doi: 10.6052/1000-0992-25-033 cstr: 32046.14.1000-0992-25-033

TIAN Tengfei^{1, 2},
LIU Zhixin³,
WANG Lizhen^{1, 2
,
,}

1.
Medical Engineering & Engineering Medicine Innovation Center, Hangzhou International Innovation Institute, Beihang University, 311115, Hangzhou, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Biomechanics and Mechanobiology (Beihang University), Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China
3.
China Automotive Technology & Research Center Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300300, China

More Information

Corresponding author: lizhenwang@buaa.edu.cn
Received Date: 2026-01-30
Accepted Date: 2026-03-05

Available Online: 2026-04-06

Abstract

Abstract

Injury biomechanics primarily investigates human responses and injury outcomes based on mechanical principles. A thorough understanding of specific injury mechanisms and associated tolerance limits is essential for improving human protection. Crash test dummies, serving as anthropomorphic substitutes that replicate human biomechanical responses during impact, are widely applied in automotive safety, sports rehabilitation, forensic analysis, military protection, and aerospace engineering. In the field of automotive safety, crash test dummies constitute essential tools for injury assessment and are generally categorized into physical dummies and computational human surrogates. This paper reviews the development history of both physical and virtual dummies, with a particular focus on parametric design methodologies used in automotive crash dummy development. Moreover, the paper discusses future trends in injury assessment techniques, with the aim of contributing to the advancement of injury biomechanics and supporting technological progress in automotive safety.
- Injury biomechanics,
- injury assessment,
- bionic design,
- crash test dummy

FullText(HTML)

References(199)

References

[1]	GB/T 17245-2004. 成年人人体惯性参数[S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局; 中国国家标准化管理委员会, 2004 (GB/T 17245-2004. 成年人人体惯性参数[S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局; 中国国家标准化管理委员会, 2004. (GB/T 17245-2004. Inertial parameters of adult human body[S]. Beijing: General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China; Standardization Administration of China, 2004). GB/T 17245-2004. 成年人人体惯性参数[S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局; 中国国家标准化管理委员会, 2004. (GB/T 17245-2004. Inertial parameters of adult human body[S]. Beijing: General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China; Standardization Administration of China, 2004.
[2]	郭建峤, 王言冰, 田强, 等. 2022. 人体肌骨的多柔体系统动力学研究进展. 力学进展, 52(2): 253-310 (Guo J Q, Wang Y B, Tian Q, et al. 2022. Advances in flexible multibody dynamics of human musculoskeletal systems. Advances in Mechanics, 52(2): 253-310). doi: 10.6052/1000-0992-21-056 Guo J Q, Wang Y B, Tian Q, et al. 2022. Advances in flexible multibody dynamics of human musculoskeletal systems. Advances in Mechanics, 52(2): 253-310 doi: 10.6052/1000-0992-21-056
[3]	李海岩, 胡静, 贺丽娟, 等. 2023. 中国体征第五百分位女性汽车乘员损伤仿生模型开发及验证. 汽车工程, 45(10): 1965-74 (LI H Y, HU J, HE L J, et al. 2023. Development and Validation of an Injury Biomimetic Model of 5th Percentile Female Occupant Exhibiting Chinese Anthropometry. Automotive Engineering, 45(10): 1965-74). doi: 10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2023.10.017 LI H Y, HU J, HE L J, et al. 2023. Development and Validation of an Injury Biomimetic Model of 5th Percentile Female Occupant Exhibiting Chinese Anthropometry. Automotive Engineering, 45(10): 1965-74. doi: 10.19562/j.chinasae.qcgc.2023.10.017
[4]	王丽珍, 樊瑜波. 2020. 过载性损伤与防护生物力学. 力学进展, 50(00): 124-168 (WANG L Z, FAN Y B. 2020. The biomechanics of injury and prevention. Adv Mech, 50(00): 124-168). WANG L Z, FAN Y B. 2020. The biomechanics of injury and prevention. Adv Mech, 50(00): 124-168.
[5]	万鑫铭, 刘煜, 张辉达, 等. 2025. 面向交通安全研究的中国体征人体数字模型胸腹部有限元建模与验证. 机械工程学报, 61(18): 299-312 (WAN X M, LIU Y, ZHANG H D, et al. 2025. Modeling and Verification for Chest and Abdomen of Chinese Human Digital Model for Traffic Safety. J. Mech. Eng, 61(18): 299-312). WAN X M, LIU Y, ZHANG H D, et al. 2025. Modeling and Verification for Chest and Abdomen of Chinese Human Digital Model for Traffic Safety. J. Mech. Eng, 61(18): 299-312.
[6]	Ackerman M J. 2022. The visible human project. Inf. Serv. Use, 42(1): 129-136. doi: 10.37019/e-anatomy/127139.de
[7]	Aekbote K, Cheng J, Belwafa J E, et al. 2018. Determination of Impact Responses of ES-2re and SID-IIs - Part I: ES-2re [J]. SAE Technical Paper, 1-29.
[8]	Aekbote K, Cheng J, Belwafa J E, et al. 2018. Determination of Impact Responses of ES-2re and SID-IIs - Part II: SID-IIs [J]. SAE Technical Paper, 1-26.
[9]	Afshari J, Haghpanahi M, Kalantarinejad R. 2017. Developing new brain injury criteria for predicting the intracranial response by calculating von Mises stress, coup pressure and contrecoup pressure. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng, 39(10): 3729-3741. doi: 10.1007/s40430-017-0830-9
[10]	Albert D L, Beeman S M, Kemper A R. 2023. Comparative biofidelity of the Hybrid III and THOR 50th male ATDs under three restraint conditions during frontal sled tests. Traffic Inj Prev, 24(sup1): S41-S46. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2176710
[11]	Albrecht T. 2011. 3D Statistical Shape Models of Human Bones [D]. PhD thesis, Universit ¨at Basel.
[12]	Alligon M, Mahlaoui N, Bouaziz O. 2024. Pitfalls in time-to-event analysis of registry data: a tutorial based on simulated and real cases. Front Epidemiol, 4: 1386922. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2024.1386922
[13]	Asanuma H, Bae H, Nakamura H, et al. 2022. Modification of the Lower Limb and the Pelvis for the Pedestrian Dummy [J]. SAE Technical Paper Series, 1-12.
[14]	Asanuma H, Bae H, Nakamura H, et al. 2023. Full-Scale Validation of Modified Pedestrian Dummy. SAE Technical Paper Series, 6(1): 1-12.
[15]	Beillas P, Giordano C, Alvarez V, et al. Development and performance of the PIPER scalable child human body models [C]//14th International conference on the protection of children in cars, Germany, 2016.
[16]	Bosma F, Van Hooijdonk P A, Kietlinski K, et al. Simcenter Madymo[M]. DHM and Posturography. 2019: 155-168.
[17]	Bruce O L, Tu J, Edwards W B. 2024. Predicting Tibia-Fibula Geometry and Density From Anatomical Landmarks Via Statistical Appearance Model: Influence of Errors on Finite Element-Calculated Bone Strain [J]. J Biomech Eng, 146(9).
[18]	Bryan R, Mohan P S, Hopkins A, et al. 2010. Statistical modelling of the whole human femur incorporating geometric and material properties. Med Eng Phys, 32(1): 57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.10.008
[19]	Campbell J Q, Petrella A J. 2016. Automated finite element modeling of the lumbar spine: Using a statistical shape model to generate a virtual population of models. J Biomech, 49(13): 2593-2599. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.05.013
[20]	Chan H, Karan S. D, Devon L. A, et al. Comparisons of initial joint angles and test buck reaction forces for relaxed and braced 5th percentile female and 50th percentile male volunteers and analogous active human body models in a simulated drivers seat[C]//The 2021 IRCOBI Conference, 2021.
[21]	Chandran V, Maquer G, Gerig T, et al. 2019. Supervised learning for bone shape and cortical thickness estimation from CT images for finite element analysis. Med Image Anal, 52: 42-55. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2018.11.001
[22]	Chen H, Poulard D, Forman J, et al. 2018. Evaluation of geometrically personalized THUMS pedestrian model response against sedan-pedestrian PMHS impact test data. Traffic Inj Prev, 19(5): 542-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1450979
[23]	Correia M A, Mclachlin S D, Cronin D S. 2020. Optimization of muscle activation schemes in a finite element neck model simulating volunteer frontal impact scenarios. J Biomech, 104: 109754. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109754
[24]	Crandall J, Wiley K, Longhitano D, et al. 2005. Development of performance specifications for a pedestrian research dummy [J]. SAE Technical Paper, 1-15.
[25]	Crandall J R, Bose D, Forman J, et al. 2011. Human surrogates for injury biomechanics research. Clin Anat, 24(3): 362-71. doi: 10.1002/ca.21152
[26]	Cui B, Tao W, Zhao H. 2021. High-Precision 3D Reconstruction for Small-to-Medium-Sized Objects Utilizing Line-Structured Light Scanning: A Review [J]. Remote Sens. , 13(21).
[27]	Danelson K A, Stitzel J D. 2015. Finite element model prediction of pulmonary contusion in vehicle-to-vehicle simulations of real-world crashes. Traffic Inj Prev, 16(6): 627-36. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.995266
[28]	Deck C, Willinger R. 2008. Improved head injury criteria based on head FE model. Int J Crashworthiness, 13(6): 667-678. doi: 10.1080/13588260802411523
[29]	Decker W, Koya B, Pak W, et al. 2019. Evaluation of finite element human body models for use in a standardized protocol for pedestrian safety assessment. Traffic Inj Prev, 20(sup2): S32-S6. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1637518
[30]	Delavari M, Foruzan A H, Chen Y-W. 2019. Accurate point correspondences using a modified coherent point drift algorithm. Biomed. Signal Process. Control, 52: 429-44. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2017.02.009
[31]	Devane K, Chan H, Albert D, et al. 2022. Implementation and calibration of active small female and average male human body models using low-speed frontal sled tests. Traffic Inj Prev, 23(sup1): S44-S9. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2114078
[32]	Devane K, Chan H, Albert D, et al. 2023. Response of small female and midsize male models with active musculature in pre-crash maneuvers and low-speed impacts. Traffic Inj Prev, 24(sup1): S9-S15. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2157209
[33]	Devane K, Gayzik F S. 2024. A simulation-based study for optimizing proportional-integral-derivative controller gains for different control strategies of an active upper extremity model using experimental data. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin, 27(1): 1-14. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2023.2165069
[34]	Di Meo E, Lombardi E, Lopez A, et al. Human Body Models customization by advanced mesh morphing: parametric THUMS[C]//International Workshop on Engineering Methodologies for Medicine and Sport, Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024: 280-297.
[35]	Draper D, Newell N, Masouros S, et al. 2021. Multiscale Validation of Multiple Human Body Model Functional Spinal Units [J]. J Biomech Eng, 143(4).
[36]	Du T, Chen J, Lan F, et al. 2018. Thoracic response of the Chinese human body model in 50th percentile male size (CHUBM-M50) in blunt impacts-investigation in speed, direction and location. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 24(1): 71-85. doi: 10.1080/13588265.2017.1400635
[37]	Duarte M R G, Duddeck F, Raponi E, et al. 2022. Pedestrian safety assessments via full human body models and advanced injury criteria. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., 45(26): 1-11. doi: 10.1007/s40430-022-03929-6
[38]	Dworzak J, Lamecker H, Von Berg J, et al. 2010. 3D reconstruction of the human rib cage from 2D projection images using a statistical shape model. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, 5(2): 111-124. doi: 10.1007/s11548-009-0390-2
[39]	Eggermont F, Mathijssen E, Bakker M, et al. 2024. Using a statistical shape model to estimate the knee landmarks for aligning femurs for femoral finite element models. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 255: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108324
[40]	El-jawahri R E, Ruan J S, Rouhana S W, et al. Further Validation of the Ford Human Body FE Model and Use of the Model to Investigate the Effects of Shoulder Belt Force Limiting of 3-Point and 4-Point Restraints in Frontal Impact [C]//The ASME 2008 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, USA, 2008.
[41]	El-mobader S H. 2018. Effect of Lap Belt Position on Kinematics & Injuries by using 6YO PIPER child HBM: in Frontal Crash Simulations [D]. Master's thesis, Karlstad Universitet.
[42]	Eppinger R H. Prediction of thoracic injury using measurable experimental parameters[C]//6th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, 1976.
[43]	Esrafilian A, Stenroth L, Mononen M E, et al. 2022. An EMG-Assisted Muscle-Force Driven Finite Element Analysis Pipeline to Investigate Joint- and Tissue-Level Mechanical Responses in Functional Activities: Towards a Rapid Assessment Toolbox. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 69(9): 2860-2871. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2022.3156018
[44]	Fahlstedt M, Meng S, Kleiven S. 2022. Influence of Strain post-processing on Brain Injury Prediction. J Biomech, 132: 1-11. doi: 10.1101/2021.07.15.452485
[45]	Fahse N, Millard M, Kempter F, et al. 2023. Dynamic human body models in vehicle safety: An overview [J]. GAMM-Mitteilungen, 46(2).
[46]	Feng W, Tang Y, He W, et al. 2022. Mode Ⅰ dynamic fracture toughness of rubberised concrete using a drop hammer device and split Hopkinson pressure bar [J]. J BUILD ENG, 48.
[47]	Fitzpatrick C K, Baldwin M A, Laz P J, et al. 2011. Development of a statistical shape model of the patellofemoral joint for investigating relationships between shape and function. J Biomech, 44(13): 2446-2452. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.06.025
[48]	Flores P. 2022. Contact mechanics for dynamical systems: a comprehensive review. MULTIBODY SYST DYN, 54(2): 127-177. doi: 10.1007/s11044-021-09803-y
[49]	Forbes P A, Cronin D S, Deng Y C. 2006. Multi-scale human body model to predict side impact thoracic trauma. Int J of Crashworthiness, 11(3): 203-216. doi: 10.1533/ijcr.2005.0391
[50]	Foster J K, Kortge J O, Wolanin M J. Hybrid III-A Biomechanically-Based Crash Test Dummy[C]//21th Stapp Car Crash Conference, 1994.
[51]	Gayzik F S, Moreno D P, Vavalle N A, et al. Development of the global human body models consortium mid-sized male full body model [C]//International workshop on human subjects for biomechanical research. Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
[52]	Gepner B D, Perez-rapela D, Forman J L, et al. Evaluation of GHBMC, THUMS and SAFER human body models in frontal impacts in reclined postures [C]//Int IRCOBI Conf Biomech Impacts, 2022.
[53]	Gerringer J W, Somasundaram K, Pintar F A. 2023. Effect of muscle activation scheme in human head-neck model on estimating cervical spine ligament strain from military volunteer frontal impact data. Accid Anal Prev, 190: 107157. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107157
[54]	Gierczycka D, Rycman A, Cronin D. 2021. Importance of passive muscle, skin, and adipose tissue mechanical properties on head and neck response in rear impacts assessed with a finite element model. Traffic Inj Prev, 22(5): 407-412. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1918685
[55]	Gil P L. 2022. Influence of active musculature on injury risk prediction on frontal crashes[D]. Master thesis, Repositorio Universidad Pontificia Comillas.
[56]	Grassi L, Schileo E, Boichon C, et al. 2014. Comprehensive evaluation of PCA-based finite element modelling of the human femur. Med Eng Phys, 36(10): 1246-1252. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.06.021
[57]	Gunji Y, Okamoto M, Takahashi Y. Examination of human body mass influence on pedestrian pelvis injury prediction using a human FE model[C]//International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury conference, 2012.
[58]	Hansen C, Venture G, Rezzoug N, et al. 2014. An individual and dynamic Body Segment Inertial Parameter validation method using ground reaction forces. J Biomech, 47(7): 1577-1581. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.03.004
[59]	Happee R, S R, A N, et al. Mathematical human body models representing a mid size male and a small female for frontal, lateral and rearward impact loading [C]//IRCOBI Conference, 2000.
[60]	Happee R, Van Haaster R, Michaelsen L, et al. Optimisation of vehicle passive safety for occupants with varying anthropometry [C]//ESV Conference. 1998: 1-7
[61]	Hartlen, D C, Cronin, D S 2022. Arc-length re-parametrization and signal registration to determine a characteristic average and statistical response corridors of biomechanical data [J]. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 10: 843148.
[62]	Hatze H. 1980. A mathematical model for the computational determination of parameter values of anthropomorphic segments. Journal of Biomechanics, 13(10): 833-43. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(80)90171-2
[63]	Haug E, Choi H-y, Robin S, et al. Human Models for Crash and Impact Simulation [M]. Computational Models for the Human Body. 2004.
[64]	Hirose O. 2021. A Bayesian Formulation of Coherent Point Drift. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 43(7): 2269-2286. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2020.2971687
[65]	Hirose O. 2023. Geodesic-Based Bayesian Coherent Point Drift. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 45(5): 5816-5832. doi: 10.1109/tpami.2022.3214191
[66]	Holcombe S A, Agnew A M, Derstine B, et al. 2020. Comparing FE human body model rib geometry to population data. Biomech Model Mechanobiol, 19(6): 2227-2239. doi: 10.1007/s10237-020-01335-2
[67]	Hostetler Z S, Gayzik F S. 2024. Lower Extremity Injury Risk Curve Development for a Human Body Model in the Underbody Blast Environment. J Biomech Eng, 146(3): 1-13. doi: 10.1115/1.4063349
[68]	Huang Y, King A I, Cavanaugh J M. 1994. A MADYMO model of near-side human occupants in side impacts. J Biomech Eng, 116(2): 228-235. doi: 10.1115/1.2895724
[69]	Huang Y, King A I, Cavanaugh J M. 1994. Finite element modeling of gross motion of human cadavers in side impact [J]. SAE transactions: 1604-1622.
[70]	Humanetics. THOR-50th Percentile Male Dummy User Manual 472-9900 [R]. Shanghai: Humanetics, 2019.
[71]	Humm J, Yoganandan N. 2021. Lower Neck Injury Assessment Risk Curves Based on Matched-Pair Human Data for Anthropomorphic Test Devices [J]. Mil Med, 186(Suppl 1): 639-644.
[72]	Iraeus J, Poojary Y N, Jaber L, et al. 2023. A new open-source finite element lumbar spine model, its tuning and validation, and development of a tissue-based injury risk function for compression fractures. Nucleus, 3(4): 1048-1072.
[73]	Iwamoto M, Kisanuki Y, Watanabe I, et al. Development of a finite element model of the total human model for safety (THUMS) and application to injury reconstruction[C]//International IRCOBI Conference, 2002.
[74]	van Hoof J, de Lange R, Wismans J S H M. 2003. Improving pedestrian safety using numerical human models. Stapp Car Crash Journal, 47: 385-421. doi: 10.4271/2003-22-0018
[75]	Janak T, Lafon Y, Petit P, et al. 2021. A Method to Use Kriging With Large Sets of Control Points to Morph Finite Element Models of the Human Body. J Biomech Eng, 143(2): 1-17. doi: 10.1115/1.4048575
[76]	Jaśkiewicz M, Frej D, Matej J, et al. 2021. Analysis of the Head of a Simulation Crash Test Dummy with Speed Motion. Energies, 14(5): 1-13.
[77]	Jin X, Kalra A, Hammad A, et al. Development and validation of whole-body finite element occupant and pedestrian models of a 70-year-old female [Z]. IRCOBI Conference. 2018: 261-283
[78]	Johan I, Erik B, Jobin J, et al. Development of SAFER HBM v11 [R]. Gothenburg, Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology, 2024.
[79]	John J, Klug C, Kranjec M, et al. 2022. Hello, world! VIVA + : A human body model lineup to evaluate sex-differences in crash protection. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 10: 918904. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.918904
[80]	Kalra A. Developing FE Human Models From Medical Images [M]. Basic Finite Element Method as Applied to Injury Biomechanics. 2018: 389-415.
[81]	Kang W, Li L, Song H, et al. 2025. Advances and challenges in the mechanics of biological soft tissues: test methods, modeling, and applications [J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 41(9).
[82]	Kang W, Li Q, Wang L, et al. 2024. Systematic analysis of constitutive models of brain tissue materials based on compression tests. Heliyon, 10(18): e37979. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37979
[83]	Kang W, Sun K, Wang L, et al. 2024. Comparative assessment of liver tissue: from microstructural and mesoscale vascular architecture to macroscopic mechanics [J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 40(7).
[84]	Kang W, Wang L, Fan Y. 2024. Viscoelastic response of gray matter and white matter brain tissues under creep and relaxation. J Biomech, 162: 111888. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111888
[85]	Kang W, Xu P, Yue Y, et al. 2022. Difference analysis of phenomenological models with two variable forms for soft tissue quasi-static mechanical characterization. Comput Biol Med, 150: 106150. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106150
[86]	Kang W, Zhang Y, Bu W, Et al. 2023. Statistical analysis of mechanical properties of biological soft tissue under quasi-static mechanical loading [J]. Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices, 17.
[87]	Kang Y S, Bendig A, Stammen J, et al. 2023. Comparison of small female PMHS thoracic responses to scaled response corridors in a frontal hub impact. Traffic Inj Prev, 24(1): 62-68. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2147789
[88]	Kempter F, Bechler F, Fehr J. Calibration Approach for Muscle Activated Human Models in Pre-Crash Maneuvers with a Driver-in-the-Loop Simulator [M]. IOS Press, 2020.
[89]	Khosravani M R, Weinberg K. 2018. A review on split Hopkinson bar experiments on the dynamic characterisation of concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 190: 1264-1283. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.187
[90]	Kimpara H, Lee J B, Yang K H, et al. 2005. Development of a three-dimensional finite element chest model for the 5th percentile female [J]. SAE Technical Paper: 251-269.
[91]	Kimpara H, Mbanisi K C, Fu J, et al. 2020. Human Model-Based Active Driving System in Vehicular Dynamic Simulation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(5): 1903-1914. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2019.2906294
[92]	Klein K F, Hu J, Reed M P, et al. 2015. Development and Validation of Statistical Models of Femur Geometry for Use with Parametric Finite Element Models. Ann Biomed Eng, 43(10): 2503-2514. doi: 10.1007/s10439-015-1307-6
[93]	Kleiven S, Hardy W N. 2002. Correlation of an FE Model of the Human Head with Local Brain Motion-Consequences for Injury Prediction. Stapp Car Crash Journal, 46: 123-144. doi: 10.4271/2002-22-0007
[94]	Koya B, Devane K, Fuentes D A M, et al. 2023. Preliminary validation of the GHBMC average male occupant models and 70YO aged model in far-side impact. Accid Anal Prev, 193: 107283. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107283
[95]	Krasna S, Dordevic S. 2020. Estimating the Effects of Awareness on Neck-Muscle Loading in Frontal Impacts with EMG and MC Sensors [J]. Sensors (Basel), 20(14).
[96]	Kudela J, Matousek R. 2022. Recent advances and applications of surrogate models for finite element method computations: a review. Soft Computing, 26(24): 13709-13733. doi: 10.1007/s00500-022-07362-8
[97]	Kumar D, Singh K, Chawla A, et al. 2023. Prediction of pedestrian injuries in motorcycle-pedestrian crashes using THUMS FE-HBM. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 29(4): 739-751. doi: 10.1080/13588265.2023.2272818
[98]	Kuppa S. Injury criteria for side impact dummies [R]. Washington, DC: National Transportation Biomechanics Research Center, National Highway Saftey Administration, 2004.
[99]	Lahkar B K, Robert T, Basso F, et al. 2025. Body segment inertial parameters of children derived from a large database of 3D body scans. J Biomech, 189: 112840. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112840
[100]	Lalwala M, Chawla A, Thomas P, et al. 2019. Finite element reconstruction of real-world pedestrian accidents using THUMS pedestrian model. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 25(4): 360-375. doi: 10.1080/13588265.2019.1594547
[101]	Larsson E, Iraeus J, Davidsson J. 2023. Investigating sources for variability in volunteer kinematics in a braking maneuver, a sensitivity analysis with an active human body model. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 11: 1203959. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1203959
[102]	Larsson E, Iraeus J, Pipkorn B, et al. 2023. Predicting occupant head displacements in evasive maneuvers; tuning and comparison of a rotational based and a translational based neck muscle controller. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 11: 1313543. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1313543
[103]	Larsson K J, Pipkorn B, Iraeus J, et al. 2022. Evaluation of a diverse population of morphed human body models for prediction of vehicle occupant crash kinematics. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin, 25(10): 1125-1155. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2021.2003790
[104]	Leledakis A, Osth J, Davidsson J, et al. 2021. The influence of car passengers' sitting postures in intersection crashes. Accid Anal Prev, 157: 106170. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106170
[105]	Li G, Meng H, Liu J, et al. 2021. A novel modeling approach for finite element human body models with high computational efficiency and stability: application in pedestrian safety analysis[J]. Acta Bioeng Biomech, 23(2).
[106]	Li X, Von Schantz A, Fahlstedt M, et al. 2024. Evaluating child helmet protection and testing standards: A study using PIPER child head models aged 1.5, 3, 6, and 18 years [J]. PLoS One, 19(1): e0286827.
[107]	Lindgren N, Yuan Q, Pipkorn B, et al. 2024. Development of personalizable female and male pedestrian SAFER human body models. Traffic Inj Prev, 25(2): 182-193. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2281280
[108]	Liu J, Yamada Y, Akiyama Y, et al. 2023. Development of Dummy Based on Impedance Properties of Human Soft Tissue Using a Nonlinear Viscoelastic Model. IEEE Access, 11: 7782-7793. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3237763
[109]	Liu S, Beillas P, Ding L, et al. 2023. PIPER adult comfort: an open-source full body human body model for seating comfort assessment and its validation under static loading conditions. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 11: 1170768. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1170768
[110]	Lizee E, Robin S, Song E, et al. 1998. Development of a 3D Finite Element Model of the Human Body [J]. SAE TECHNICAL PAPER SERIES: 1-23.
[111]	Ma Z, Chen J, Du T. 2024. Comparison of Different Material Constitutive Models for Predicting Aortic Biomechanical Response and Injury in Blunt Side Impacts [J]. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, 24(02).
[112]	Valdano M, Jiménez Octavio J R, Vives Torres C M, et al. 2021. Assessment of Madymo active human body model kinematics and dynamics by means of human volunteer response at low-speed frontal impacts[J]. International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury, 122-135.
[113]	Manuel Valdano J R J-o, Carmen M. VIVES-TORRES, FRANCISCO J. LóPEZ-VALDéS, BENGT PIPKORN. 2021. Assessment of Madymo Active Human Body Model Kinematics and Dynamics by means of Human Volunteer Response at Low-Speed Frontal Impacts [J]. International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury: 122-135.
[114]	Martynenko O V, Kempter F, Kleinbach C, et al. 2023. Development and verification of a physiologically motivated internal controller for the open-source extended Hill-type muscle model in LS-DYNA. Biomech Model Mechanobiol, 22(6): 2003-2032. doi: 10.1007/s10237-023-01748-9
[115]	Martynenko O V, Stollenmaier K, Endler C A, et al. 2019. Towards overcoming the bottleneck of optimizing control parameters in finite element active human body models [J]. Pamm, 19(1).
[116]	Matsuda T, Kobayashi N, Fujita N, et al. Development of a human body model (THUMS Version 7) to simulate kinematics and injuries of reclined occupants in frontal collisions[C]//The 27th Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) Conference, 2023.
[117]	Mertz H, Irwin A, Melvin J, et al. 1989. Size, Weight and Biomechanical Impact Response Requirements for Adult Size Small Female and Large Male Dummies [J]. SAE Technical Paper: 133-144.
[118]	Mertz H J. 1984. A procedure for normalizing impact response data [J]. SAE transactions: 351-358.
[119]	Mertz H J, Irwin A L, Prasad P, et al. 2016. Biomechanical and scaling basis for frontal and side impact injury assessment reference values [J]. SAE Technical Paper: 1-34.
[120]	Meythaler, J M, Peduzzi, J D, Eleftheriou, E, et al. 2001. Current concepts: diffuse axonal injury–associated traumatic brain injury. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 82(10): 1461-1471. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.25137
[121]	Mishra A, Ghosh P, Chitteti R, et al. 2020. Development of a Chinese 5th percentile female active human body model. Hip, 1(6): 44-47.
[122]	Miura S, Takahashi S, Parque V, et al. 2021. Small-Scale Human Impact Anthropomorphic Test Device Using the Similarity Rule. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 68(8): 7188-7198. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2020.3003590
[123]	Mo F, Liang Z, Tian T, et al. 2024. A Finite Element Human Body Model of Chinese Midsize Male for Pedestrian Safety Analysis. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 21(6): 2924-2941. doi: 10.1007/s42235-024-00597-1
[124]	Mo F, Luo D, Tan Z, et al. 2021. A Human Active Lower Limb Model for Chinese Pedestrian Safety Evaluation. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 18(4): 872-886. doi: 10.1007/s42235-021-0067-2
[125]	Mo F, Li Y, Li J, et al. 2022. A three-dimensional finite element foot-ankle model and its personalisation methods analysis. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 219: 107108. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107108
[126]	Muller A, Pontonnier C, Dumont G. 2017. Uncertainty propagation in multibody human model dynamics. Multibody System Dynamics, 40(2): 177-192. doi: 10.1007/s11044-017-9566-7
[127]	Nahum A M, Melvin J W. 2002. Accidental Injury: Biomechanics and Prevention [M]. New York: Springer.
[128]	Nasim M, Galvanetto U. 2023. Muscle activity on head-first compression responses of a finite element neck model. Forces in Mechanics, 10: 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.finmec.2022.100163
[129]	Ngo A V, Becker J, Thirunavukkarasu D, et al. 2021. Investigation of occupant kinematics and injury risk in a reclined and rearward-facing seat under various frontal crash velocities. J Safety Res, 79: 26-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.08.001
[130]	Nie B, Forman J L, Joodaki H, et al. 2016. Scaling approach in predicting the seatbelt loading and kinematics of vulnerable occupants: How far can we go?. Traffic injury prevention, 17(sup1): 93-100. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1189545
[131]	Nolle L V, Mishra A, Martynenko O V, et al. 2022. Evaluation of muscle strain injury severity in active human body models. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 135: 105463. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105463
[132]	Nolle L V, Wochner I, Hammer M, et al. 2024. Using muscle-tendon load limits to assess unphysiological musculoskeletal model deformation and Hill-type muscle parameter choice. PLoS One, 19(11): e0302949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302949
[133]	Nylund M. Rib fracture injury risk function assessment for the THOR-50M using population-based finite element crash reconstructions [D]. Master thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, 2022.
[134]	Osth J, Brolin K, Brase D. 2015. A human body model with active muscles for simulation of pretensioned restraints in autonomous braking interventions. Traffic Inj Prev, 16: 304-313. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.931949
[135]	Otmani S, Michon G, Watier B. 2023. Use of adult anthropometric tables to estimate children body segment inertial parameters. Int Biomech, 10(1): 18-28. doi: 10.1080/23335432.2023.2268686
[136]	Ovsjanikov M, Ben-chen M, Solomon J, et al. 2012. Functional maps: a flexible representation of maps between shapes. ACM Transactions on Graphics (ToG), 31(4): 1-11.
[137]	Pithioux M, Pascale C, Nancy S-O, et al. 2005. Influence of muscle preactivation of the lower limb on impact dynamics in the case of frontal collision. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 10(6): 557-565. doi: 10.1533/ijcr.2005.0374
[138]	Pradhan V, Ramachandra R, Stammen J, et al. 2024. Biofidelity Assessment of the GHBMC M50-O Seated in a Honda Accord Seat in a Rear-Facing Configuration during a High-Speed Frontal Impact. SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety, 12(3): 355-398. doi: 10.4271/09-12-03-0014
[139]	Ptak M. 2019. Pedestrian Safety: A New Method to Assess Pedestrian Kinematics. Transport, 34(1): 41-51. doi: 10.3846/transport.2019.7081
[140]	Putra I P A, Iraeus J, Sato F, et al. 2020. Optimization of Female Head-Neck Model with Active Reflexive Cervical Muscles in Low Severity Rear Impact Collisions. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 49(1): 115-128. doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02512-1
[141]	Putra I P A, Iraeus J, Sato F, et al. 2022. Finite element human body models with active reflexive muscles suitable for sex based whiplash injury prediction. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 10: 968939. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.968939
[142]	Putra I P A, Thomson R. 2022. Analysis of control strategies for VIVA OpenHBM with active reflexive neck muscles. Biomech Model Mechanobiol, 21(6): 1731-1742. doi: 10.1007/s10237-022-01616-y
[143]	Rawska K, Gepner B, Moreau D, et al. 2020. Submarining sensitivity across varied seat configurations in autonomous driving system environment. Traffic Inj Prev, 21(sup1): S1-S6. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1791324
[144]	Robert T, Lahkar B K, Della-vedova F B, et al. 2025. Estimation of children’s 3D body segment inertia parameters from body scans. Multidisciplinary Biomechanics Journal, 49(1): 71-73. doi: 10.46298/mbj.14475
[145]	Robertson W S P. A modern take on the theoretical modelling of inertial properties of a human body for biomechanical simulations [C]//The 20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, 2013.
[146]	Robin S. 2001. HUMOS : HUMOS: Human model for safety ~ A joint effort towards the development of refined human-like car occupant models [J]. SAE Technical Paper, 1-9.
[147]	Rommel D S N. 2018. Occupant protection design with FE human body models [D]. PhD thesis, Medizinische Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
[148]	Ruan J, El-jawahri R, Chai L, et al. 2003. Prediction and analysis of human thoracic impact responses and injuries in cadaver impacts using a full human body finite element model [J]. SAE Technical Paper, 299-321.
[149]	Sahoo D, Deck C, Willinger R. 2016. Brain injury tolerance limit based on computation of axonal strain. Accid Anal Prev, 92: 53-70. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.013
[150]	Sbriglio C, Ptak M, & Kwiatkowski A. 2025. Advances in Computational Modelling of Head Injury Biomechanics - a Comprehensive Review [J]. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 1-43.
[151]	Schmitt, K U, Niederer, P F, Muser, M H, et al. 2013. Trauma biomechanics: Introduction to accidental injury[M]. Springer Science & Business Media.
[152]	Schoell S L, Weaver A A, Urban J E, et al. 2015. Development and validation of an older occupant finite element model of a mid-sized male for investigation of age-related injury risk [J]. SAE Technical Paper: 359-383.
[153]	Schuller F, Mack P, Brun-cassan F, et al. PRAKIMOD: peugeot/renault accidents kinematics model theory, validation and applications [C]//International IRCOBI Conference on the Biomechanics of Impacts. Bergisch Gladback, 1988.
[154]	Seguí-gómez M, Lopez-valdes F J. Injury Severity Scaling [M]. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2012: 281-295.
[155]	Shi L, Han Y, Huang H, et al. 2020. Evaluation of injury thresholds for predicting severe head injuries in vulnerable road users resulting from ground impact via detailed accident reconstructions. Biomech Model Mechanobiol, 19(5): 1845-1863. doi: 10.1007/s10237-020-01312-9
[156]	Shin J, Donlon J P, Richardson R, et al. 2023. Comparison of thoracolumbar spine kinematics and injuries in reclined frontal impact sled tests between mid-size adult female and male PMHS. Accid Anal Prev, 193: 107334. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107334
[157]	Singh B, Basri M A. 2022. Lower limb response to anti-personnel landmine blast explosions: injury assessment and mitigation strategies. Journal of Transformative Technologies and Sustainable Development, 6(1): 14.
[158]	Skrinjar L, Slavič J, Boltežar M. 2018. A review of continuous contact-force models in multibody dynamics. INT J MECH SCI, 145: 171-187. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.07.010
[159]	Slykhouse L, Zaseck L W, Miller C, et al. 2019. Anatomically-based skeletal coordinate systems for use with impact biomechanics data intended for anthropomorphic test device development. J Biomech, 92: 162-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.05.032
[160]	Somasundaram K, Hauschild H, Driesslein K, et al. 2023. THOR-05F biofidelity evaluation in reclined and upright seated postures subjected to frontal crash pulses. Accid Anal Prev, 191: 1-9. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4391355
[161]	Song Y. 2023. Human Digital Twin, the Development and Impact on Design. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 23(6): 060819. doi: 10.1115/1.4063132
[162]	Soni A, Schilling, S. Eickhoff, B. Comparing frontal impact responses of a Q10 CAE Dummy model and scaled PIPER 10-year-old pediatric human body model [C]//Protection of children in cars. Munich, 2023.
[163]	Swift N B, Hsiung B K, Kennedy E B, et al. 2016. Dynamic impact testing of hedgehog spines using a dual-arm crash pendulum. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 61: 271-282. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.03.019
[164]	Tang J, Zhou Q, Huang Y. 2023. Self-Supervised Learning for Non-Rigid Registration Between Near-Isometric 3D Surfaces in Medical Imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 42(2): 519-532. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2022.3218662
[165]	Tang J, Zhou Q, Shen W, et al. 2023. Can we reposition finite element human body model like dummies?. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 11: 1-13. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1176818
[166]	Thompson A, Bertocci G, Smalley C. 2018. Femur loading in feet-first fall experiments using an anthropomorphic test device. J Forensic Leg Med, 58: 25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2018.03.017
[167]	Tian T, Xiao S, You S, et al. 2023. Effect of hip flexion angle on lower limb injuries of occupants in autonomous vehicle crashes. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin, 26(16): 1966-1979. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2022.2162338
[168]	Torres-ariza J L, Saez L M, Torres-san Miguel C R. 2024. Oblique pole-side crash assessment using the six-year-old HBM PIPER. Heliyon, 10(16): 1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35927
[169]	Tran T D, Holtz J, Müller G, et al. 2021. Validation of MADYMO human body model in braking maneuver with highly reclined seatback. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 27(6): 1743-1752. doi: 10.1080/13588265.2021.2008289
[170]	Trube N, Lerge P, Nölle L V, et al. Development and plausibility assessment of an active Human Body Model in numerical cyclist to vehicle collision simulations based on real-life accident data[C]//The IRCOBI Conference, 2024.
[171]	Trube N, Riedel W, Boljen M. 2021. How muscle stiffness affects human body model behavior. Biomed Eng Online, 20(53): 1-39. doi: 10.1186/s12938-021-00876-6
[172]	Umale S, Khandelwal P, Humm J, et al. 2020. Development and validation of an elderly human body model for frontal impacts. Traffic Inj Prev, 21(sup1): 147-149. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1829922
[173]	Vavalle N A, Thompson A B, Hayes A R, et al. 2014. Investigation of the mass distribution of a detailed seated male finite element model. J Appl Biomech, 30(3): 471-476. doi: 10.1123/jab.2013-0007
[174]	Verver M M. 2004. Numerical tools for comfort analyses of automotive seating[D]. PhD Thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
[175]	Verykokou S, Ioannidis C. 2023. An Overview on Image-Based and Scanner-Based 3D Modeling Technologies. Sensors, 23(596): 1-22. doi: 10.3390/s23020596
[176]	Vezin P, Verriest J P. Development of a set of numerical human models for safety[C]//The 19th International ESV Conference, 2005 .
[177]	Vlase S, Marin M, Iuliu N. 2022. Finite Element Method-Based Elastic Analysis of Multibody Systems: A Review. Mathematics, 10(2): 1-15. doi: 10.3390/math10020257
[178]	Wagner D, Kamer L, Rommens P M, et al. 2014. 3D statistical modeling techniques to investigate the anatomy of the sacrum, its bone mass distribution, and the trans-sacral corridors. J Orthop Res, 32(11): 1543-1548. doi: 10.1002/jor.22667
[179]	Wang Y, Cao L, Bai Z, et al. 2016. A parametric ribcage geometry model accounting for variations among the adult population. J Biomech, 49(13): 2791-2798. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.06.020
[180]	Wang Z J. 2022. Biomechanical Responses of the THOR-AV ATD in Rear Facing Test Conditions. SAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility, 4(6): 2089-2105. doi: 10.4271/2022-01-0836
[181]	Wu T, Sato F, Antona-makoshi J, et al. 2022. Integrating Human and Nonhuman Primate Data to Estimate Human Tolerances for Traumatic Brain Injury. J Biomech Eng, 144(7): 1-10. doi: 10.1115/1.4053209
[182]	Xiao S, Shi X, Qu Z, et al. 2019. Knee Kinetics Responses to Frontal Impact with Active Muscle Function During Vehicle Crash. INT J PRECIS ENG MAN, 20(11): 2007-2017. doi: 10.1007/s12541-019-00201-1
[183]	Xu T, Sheng X, Zhang T, et al. 2018. Development and Validation of Dummies and Human Models Used in Crash Test. Appl Bionics Biomech, 2018: 1-12.
[184]	Yan L, Liu C, Zhu X, et al. 2023. Translational medical bioengineering research of traumatic brain injury among Chinese and American pedestrians caused by vehicle collision based on human body finite element modeling. Front Neurol, 14: 1-11. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1296902
[185]	Yan Y, Huang J, Li F, et al. 2018. Investigation of the Effect of Neck Muscle Active Force on Whiplash Injury of the Cervical Spine. Appl Bionics Biomech, 2018: 1-10.
[186]	Yang K H. Basic Finite Element Method as Applied to Injury Biomechanics[M]. Academic Press, 2017.
[187]	Yang P, Katangoori D, Noll S, et al. 2023. Development and Validation of a Dynamic Abdominal Pressure Twin Sensor Finite Element Model [J]. SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety, 11(3).
[188]	Yang S, Tang J, Nie B, et al. 2022. Assessment of brain injury characterization and influence of modeling approaches. Sci Rep, 12(1): 13597. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16713-2
[189]	Yang S, Zhou Q, Nie B, et al. 2022. A human body model based method for injury risk prediction considering occupant stature and posture. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 28(4): 498-510. doi: 10.1080/13588265.2022.2109709
[190]	Yoganandan N, Nahum A M. Accidental injury: Biomechanics and prevention [M]. New York, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London: Springer-Verlag, 2015.
[191]	Yu Z, Zheng S, Liu K, et al. 2023. A modified finite element dummy model of Chinese adult male used for train collision simulations. International Journal of Rail Transportation, 12(4): 709-732. doi: 10.1080/23248378.2023.2201585
[192]	Yuen K F, Cronin D S, Deng Y C. Lung response and injury in side impact conditions [C]//IRCOBI Conference. Switzerland, 2008.
[193]	Zeng W, Hume D R, Lu Y, et al. 2023. Modeling of active skeletal muscles: a 3D continuum approach incorporating multiple muscle interactions. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 11: 1153692. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1153692
[194]	Zhang A, Min Z, Zhang Z, et al. 2023. Anisotropic Generalized Bayesian Coherent Point Drift for Point Set Registration. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 20(1): 495-505. doi: 10.1109/TASE.2022.3159553
[195]	Zhang K, Cao L, Fanta A, et al. 2017. An automated method to morph finite element whole-body human models with a wide range of stature and body shape for both men and women. J Biomech, 60: 253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.06.015
[196]	Zhang X, Guo R, Tong Z, et al. 2025. 3D medical model registration using scale-invariant coherent point drift algorithm for AR. Computers & Graphics, 127: 1-11.
[197]	Zhang Y, Tang L, Liu Y, et al. 2024. An Objective Injury Threshold for the Maximum Principal Strain Criterion for Brain Tissue in the Finite Element Head Model and Its Application. Bioengineering (Basel), 11(9): 1-23.
[198]	Zhao J, Narwani G. Development of a human body finite element model for restraint system R&D applications [C]//The 19th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, 2005.
[199]	Zuo C, He K, Shao J, et al. Self Model for Embodied Intelligence: Modeling Full-Body Human Musculoskeletal System and Locomotion Control with Hierarchical Low-Dimensional Representation [C]//The 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2024.