量子计算: 计算力学的新焦点

许永春; 匡增涛; 黄群; 阳杰; 胡衡

doi:10.6052/1000-0992-24-039

量子计算: 计算力学的新焦点

doi: 10.6052/1000-0992-24-039 cstr: 32046.14.1000-0992-24-039

许永春¹,
匡增涛¹,
黄群¹,
阳杰¹,
胡衡^{1, 2, ,}

1.
武汉大学土木建筑工程学院, 武汉 430072
2.
宁夏大学数学统计学院, 银川 750021

基金项目: 国家科技部重点研发计划(2022YFE0113100)和国家自然科学基金项目(12432009, 11920101002, 12202322, 12172262)资助.

详细信息

作者简介:
胡衡, 宁夏大学教授, 武汉大学弘毅特聘客座教授. 主要从事计算固体力学与复合材料力学领域研究工作. 2006年获法国梅斯大学博士学位; 2007年在巴黎综合理工从事博士后研究工作; 2008至2023年任职武汉大学; 2024年入职宁夏大学. 入选教育部长江学者特聘教授, 主持国家自然科学基金重点项目、重点国际合作研究项目及国家重点研发计划重点专项等; 兼任Composite Structures联席主编(Co-Editor-in-Chief)、国际计算力学学会(IACM)理事、中国力学学会理事

通讯作者:
huheng@whu.edu.cn

中图分类号: O302
计量
- 文章访问数: 112
- HTML全文浏览量: 18
- PDF下载量: 42
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-10-28
- 录用日期: 2024-12-30
- 网络出版日期: 2025-01-03

Quantum computing: The new focus in computational mechanics

1.
School of Civil Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
2.
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China

More Information

Corresponding author: huheng@whu.edu.cn

摘要

摘要: 量子计算在算力上有望指数级超越经典计算, 然而亟需拓展实际应用场景. 计算力学应用场景丰富, 但面临多尺度、多物理场、极端环境等问题带来的算力挑战. 因此, 两者在算力和应用场景上的互补融合式发展前景广阔. 本文旨在梳理量子计算在计算力学中的应用现状, 并展望该领域未来的发展趋势.
- 量子计算 /
- 计算力学
Abstract: Quantum computing has the potential to exponentially surpass classical computing in terms of computational power, but its practical applications need further expansion. At the same time, computational mechanics offers a wide range of applications, but faces challenges of significant computational power requirements arising from multi-scale, multi-physics, and extreme conditions, among others. Therefore, the complementary development of quantum computing and computational mechanics holds great promise. This paper reviews the current state of quantum computing applications in computational mechanics and discusses future trends in this field.
- quantum computing /
- computational mechanics

HTML全文

图 1 量子计算流程示意图(郭光灿 2022)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 编织型复合壳体的多尺度仿真对比(Kuang et al. 2025). (a) 量子计算增强的数据驱动计算均匀化方法. (b) 并发多尺度有限元方法

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(61)

[1]	郭光灿. 2022. 颠覆: 迎接第二次量子革命. 北京: 科学出版社 (Guo G C. 2022. Subversion: Embracing the second quantum revolution. Beijing: Science Press). Guo G C. 2022. Subversion: Embracing the second quantum revolution. Beijing: Science Press.
[2]	Ali M, Kabel M. 2023. Performance study of variational quantum algorithms for solving the poisson equation on a quantum computer. Physical Review Applied, 20: 014054. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.014054
[3]	Arute F, Arya K, Babbush R, Bacon D, Bardin J C, Barends R, Biswas R, Boixo S, Brandao F GSL, Buell D A. 2019. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature, 574: 505-510. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5
[4]	Bharadwaj S S, Sreenivasan K R. 2023. Hybrid quantum algorithms for flow problems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120: e2311014120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2311014120
[5]	Bravo-Prieto C, LaRose R, Cerezo M, Subasi Y, Cincio L, Coles P J. 2023. Variational quantum linear solver. Quantum, 7: 1188. doi: 10.22331/q-2023-11-22-1188
[6]	Buhrman H, Cleve R, Watrous J, Petruccione F. 2001. Quantum fingerprinting. Physical Review Letters, 87: 167902. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.167902
[7]	Chen Z, Ma T, Ye C, Xu L, Tan M, et al. 2024. Enabling large-scale and high-precision fluid simulations on near-term quantum computers. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 432: 117428. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2024.117428
[8]	Coppersmith D. 1994. An approximate Fourier transform useful in quantum factoring. IBM Research Report: RC-19642.
[9]	Feynman R P. 1982. Simulating physics with computers. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21: 6-7.
[10]	Geers M G, Kouznetsova V G, Brekelmans W. 2010. Multi-scale computational homogenization: Trends and challenges. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 234: 2175-2182. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2009.08.077
[11]	Georgescu I M, Ashhab S, Nori F. 2014. Quantum simulation. Reviews of Modern Physics, 86: 153-185. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.86.153
[12]	Giovannetti V, Lloyd S, Maccone L. 2008. Quantum random access memory. Physical Review Letters, 100: 160501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.160501
[13]	Givois F, Kabel M, Gauger N. 2022. QFT-based homogenization. arXiv preprint arXiv, 2207: 12949.
[14]	Grover L K. 2001. From Schrödinger’s equation to the quantum search algorithm. American Journal of Physics, 69: 769-777. doi: 10.1119/1.1359518
[15]	Harrow A W, Hassidim A, Lloyd S. 2009. Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations. Physical Review Letters, 103: 150502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.150502
[16]	Henderson J M, Kath J, Golden J K, Percus A G, O’Malley D. 2024. Addressing quantum’s “fine print” with efficient state preparation and information extraction for quantum algorithms and geologic fracture networks. Scientific Reports, 14: 3592. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52759-0
[17]	Jin S, Liu N, Yu Y. 2023. Quantum simulation of partial differential equations: Applications and detailed analysis. Physical Review A, 108: 032603. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.108.032603
[18]	Kadowaki T, Nishimori, H. 1998. Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model. Physical Review E, 58: 5355. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.5355
[19]	Key F, Freinberger L. 2024. A formulation of structural design optimization problems for quantum annealing. Mathematics, 12: 482. doi: 10.3390/math12030482
[20]	Kim Y, Eddins A, Anand S, Wei K X, Van Den Berg E, Rosenblatt S, Nayfeh H, Wu Y, Zaletel M, Temme K, Kandala A. 2023. Evidence for the utility of quantum computing before fault tolerance. Nature, 618: 500-505. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06096-3
[21]	Kirchdoerfer T, Ortiz M. 2016. Data-driven computational mechanics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 304: 81-101. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2016.02.001
[22]	Kuang Z, Xu Y, Huang Q, Yang J, Kihal C E, Hu H. 2025. Quantum computing with error mitigation for data-driven computational mechanics. Composite Structures, 351: 118625. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118625
[23]	Leyton S K, Osborne T J. 2008. A quantum algorithm to solve nonlinear differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv, 0812: 4423.
[24]	Li Y, Benjamin S C. 2017. Efficient variational quantum simulator incorporating active error minimization. Physical Review X, 7: 021050.
[25]	Liu B, Ortiz M, Cirak F. 2024. Towards quantum computational mechanics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 432: 117403. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2024.117403
[26]	Liu B F, Zhu L X, He G W. 2023. Quantum implementation of numerical methods for convection-diffusion equations: Toward computational fluid dynamics. Communications in Computational Physics, 33: 425-451. doi: 10.4208/cicp.OA-2022-0081
[27]	Liu J P, Kolden H Ø, Krovi H K, Loureiro N F, Trivisa K, Childs A M. 2021. Efficient quantum algorithm for dissipative nonlinear differential equations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118: 2026805118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2026805118
[28]	Liu Y, Liu J, Raney J R, Wang P. 2024. Quantum computing for solid mechanics and structural engineering—A demonstration with variational quantum eigensolver. Extreme Mechanics Letters, 67: 102117. doi: 10.1016/j.eml.2023.102117
[29]	Lloyd S, Mohseni M, Rebentrost P. 2013. Quantum algorithms for supervised and unsupervised machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv, 1307: 0411.
[30]	Lloyd S, De Palma G, Gokler C, Kiani B, Liu Z W, Marvian M, Tennie F, Palmer T. 2020. Quantum algorithm for nonlinear differential equations. arXiv preprint, arXiv : 2011.06571.
[31]	Lu Z, Yang Y. 2024. Quantum computing of reacting flows via Hamiltonian simulation. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 40: 105440. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2024.105440
[32]	Lubasch M, Joo J, Moinier P, Kiffner M, Jaksch D. 2020. Variational quantum algorithms for nonlinear problems. Physical Review A, 101: 010301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.010301
[33]	Lundstrom M. 2003. Moore’s law forever. Science, 299: 210-211. doi: 10.1126/science.1079567
[34]	Lye K O, Mishra S, Ray D. 2020. Deep learning observables in computational fluid dynamics. Journal of Computational Physics, 410: 109339. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109339
[35]	Morales M E, Pira L, Schleich P, Koor K, Costa P, An D, Lin L, Rebentrost P, Berry D W. 2024. Quantum linear system solvers: A survey of algorithms and applications. arXiv preprint, arXiv : 2411.02522.
[36]	Meng Z, Yang Y. 2023. Quantum computing of fluid dynamics using the hydrodynamic Schrödinger equation. Physical Review Research, 5: 033182. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.033182
[37]	Meng Z, Zhong J, Xu S, Wang K, Chen J, et al. 2024. Simulating unsteady fluid flows on a superconducting quantum processor. Communications Physics, 7: 349.
[38]	Montanaro A, Pallister S. 2016. Quantum algorithms and the finite element method. Physical Review A, 93: 032324. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.032324
[39]	Moulinec H, Suquet P. 1998. A numerical method for computing the overall response of nonlinear composites with complex microstructure. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 157: 69-94. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00218-1
[40]	Mukherjee S, Lu D, Raghavan B, Breitkopf P, Dutta S, Xiao M, Zhang W. 2021. Accelerating large-scale topology optimization: State-of-the-art and challenges. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 1-23.
[41]	Nielsen M A, Chuang I L. 2010. Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[42]	Peruzzo A, McClean J, Shadbolt P, Yung M H, Zhou X Q, Love P J, Aspuru-Guzik A, O’brien J L. 2014. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor. Nature Communications, 5: 4213. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5213
[43]	Preskill J. 2018. Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum, 2: 79. doi: 10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79
[44]	Raisuddin O M, De S. 2022. FEqa: Finite element computations on quantum annealers. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 395: 115014. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2022.115014
[45]	Rebentrost P, Mohseni M, Lloyd S. 2014. Quantum support vector machine for big data classification. Physical Review Letters, 113: 130503. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.130503
[46]	Sato Y, Kondo R, Hamamura I, Onodera T, Yamamoto N. 2024. Hamiltonian simulation for hyperbolic partial differential equations by scalable quantum circuits. Physical Review Research, 6: 033246. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.033246
[47]	Schaller R R. 1997. Moore’s law: Past, present and future. IEEE spectrum 34 : 52-59.
[48]	Shao H J, Wang Y X, Zhu D Z, Zhu Y S, Sun H N, Chen S Y, Zhang C, Fan Z J, Deng Y, Yao X C, Chen Y A, Pan J W. 2024. Antiferromagnetic phase transition in a 3D fermionic Hubbard model. Nature 632 : 1-6.
[49]	Song C, Xu K, Li H, Zhang Y R, Zhang X, Liu W, Guo Q, Wang Z, Ren W, Hao J. 2019. Generation of multicomponent atomic Schrödinger cat states of up to 20 qubits. Science, 365: 574-577. doi: 10.1126/science.aay0600
[50]	Temme K, Bravyi S, Gambetta J M. 2017. Error mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits. Physical Review Letters, 119: 180509. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.180509
[51]	Trahan C J, Loveland M, Davis N, Ellison E. 2023. A variational quantum linear solver application to discrete finite-element methods. Entropy, 25: 580. doi: 10.3390/e25040580
[52]	Wiebe N, Kapoor A, Svore K M. 2015. Quantum nearest-neighbor algorithms for machine learning. Quantum Information and Computation, 15: 318-358.
[53]	Wils K, Chen B Y. 2023. A symbolic approach to discrete structural optimization using quantum annealing. Mathematics, 11: 3451. doi: 10.3390/math11163451
[54]	Xiao J, Endo K, Muramatsu M, Nomura R, Moriguchi S, Terada K. 2024. Application of factorization machine with quantum annealing to hyperparameter optimization and metamodel-based optimization in granular flow simulations. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 48: 3432-3451. doi: 10.1002/nag.3800
[55]	Xu Y, Kuang Z, Huang Q, Yang J, Hamid Z, Potier-Ferry M, Huang K, Zhang J-C, Fan H, Hu H. 2024a, A robust quantum nonlinear solver based on the asymptotic numerical method. arXiv preprint, arXiv : 2412.03939.
[56]	Xu Y, Yang J, Kuang Z, Huang Q, Huang W, Hu H. 2024b. Quantum computing enhanced distance-minimizing data-driven computational mechanics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 419: 116675. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2023.116675
[57]	Xue C, Wu Y, Guo G. 2021. Quantum newton’s method for solving the system of nonlinear equations. World Scientific Publishing Company, 11: 2140004. doi: 10.1142/S201032472140004X
[58]	Xue C, Xu X, Wu Y, Guo G. 2022. Quantum algorithm for solving a quadratic nonlinear system of equations. Physical Review A, 106: 032427. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.106.032427
[59]	Yarkoni S, Raponi E, Bäck T, Schmitt S. 2022. Quantum annealing for industry applications: Introduction and review. Reports on Progress in Physics, 85: 104001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/ac8c54
[60]	Ye Z, Qian X, Pan W. 2023. Quantum topology optimization via quantum annealing. IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, 4: 1-15. doi: 10.1109/TQE.2023.3266410
[61]	Zhong H S, Wang H, Deng Y H, Chen M C, Peng L C, et al. 2020. Quantum computational advantage using photons. Science, 370: 1460-1463. doi: 10.1126/science.abe8770